The Canary Islands Archipelago, an area in the Atlantic where oil tankers must sail carefully and inform the local authorities to avoid environmental damage,  is becoming the stage for a new chapter in the world’s race for oil. This week, the Spanish Supreme Court cleared Spanish oil company Repsol’s plans to drill up to three wells in the area to determine if the exploitation of its alleged oil reserves is economically viable.

The Canary Islands is a group of seven major islands of Spain situated in the Atlantic Ocean just 160 kilometers (around 100 miles) from Morocco and Mauritania in Northwest Africa. Their location makes them a unique ecosystem, with at least 2,000 native animal species. Since 2005, they have been part of the United Nations’ Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas, together with 12 more ecosystems including the Galapagos Archipelago, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, and Hawaii’s Papahanaumokuakea National Monument.

As a result of the designation, hundreds of oil tankers that cross the Canary Islands’ waters every year have to give notice in advance to Spanish authorities and follow strict corridors when they cross the 7,000 square kilometer (4,300 square miles) protected zone.

That area, however, will be drilled in the coming weeks by Repsol now that the court has cleared the last hurdles for its plans. The company plans to drill the wells at a depth of around 1 kilometer (a bit more than half a mile) and then 3.5 kilometers more inside the Earth’s crust.

The go-ahead concludes a 14-year-long feud that has pitched many interests against each other: the Canary Islands regional governments against the Spanish authorities; the tourism industry against the oil industry; and conservatives against socialists (and, sometimes, different factions inside those both parties against each other). Even Spain and Morocco have argued about how to divide the waters where the oil is.

Morocco has been drilling on its side of the field for more than one decade, but so far it has not found oil. Two oil companies—Britain’s Cairn, and Genel, formally Turkish although incorporated in the tax haven of the British Channel Islands—have just abandoned their efforts in the area.

In spite of this lack of results, Repsol is firmly committed to its plans on the Spanish side of the line. The company has even stated that it plans to invest up to 7.4 billion euros ($10 billion) in the project, but first it needs to find oil that is economically viable to exploit.

It also has the support of the Spanish government, which has accepted the company’s environmental assessment of the project, although it has admitted that the area where the wells will be drilled is of particular importance to, among other species, beaked, sperm and pilot whales (which can be seen in pods of hundreds of individuals), bottlenose dolphins, and loggerhead turtles.

Repsol owns and operates one of the most sophisticated imagery tools to map deepwater oil fields, and it insists that there is no reason to fear oil spills. Its spokesperson Kristian Rix has declared to The Wall Street Journal that the approval “shows that Repsol does things rigorously in relation to environmental protection.”

The project is extremely controversial among the 2 million people who live in the Archipelago. “I am worried about an accident like the one suffered by the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico,” the president of the islands’ regional government, Paulino Rivero, said during a visit to Washington D.C. last Wednesday, June 25.

The risks go beyond oil spills, and include acoustic pollution—a problem that the islands’ cetaceans have already suffered: in 2005, following massive beachings of beaked whales—animals that dive three kilometers deep and stay submerged for more than two hours—NATO cancelled indefinitely its war games in the area, fearful that the ships’ sonar could kill the cetaceans. Since then, there have been no more massive beachings of sea mammals in the islands.

The field could yield, according to some estimates, 140,000 barrels per day over 30 years, which means around 10 percent of Spain’s current oil consumption, but some within Repsol privately doubt it will be ever economically viable. However, the recent crises in Ukraine and in Iraq have exposed Europe’s energy dependency, and the Spanish government has not hidden its satisfaction with the fact that Spain’s natural gas comes from Algeria instead of Russia, like almost everyone else’s in Europe.

Last year, Repsol’s CEO, Antonio Brufau, called the resistance against the exploration “political” and accused the opponents to the company’s plans of ignoring the demands of a region, the Canary Archipelago, that has a 33 percent unemployment rate. Canarian authorities retort that tourism is the biggest industry in the region, with 12 million visitors per year, and that the last thing they need are oil platforms.

The Canary Islands’ oil controversy is just a part of a much bigger development that includes Morocco and even Mauritania, a country that it is opening its waters—home of the biggest colony of the critically endangered Mediterranean monk seal and to some of the last blue whales in the Atlantic Ocean—to oil exploration.

So far, it seems that the race for the tentative oil reserves of the Northwest African coast is bringing a lot of noise and disturbance to an environmentally key area. But so far, very little—if any—oil.


  1. Simon Cove
    Fuerta ventura
    April 23, 2015, 11:39 am

    It blows amazingly here and is scorching hot and potential volcanic geothermal energy. Why drill at all… Stupid

  2. Silvio
    August 29, 2014, 8:19 am

    Hi, im spanish and im in favor of oil drilling.

    Fact is, Spain is too dependent. The distance the pumps will be from the coast is quite far and im sure that with all the issues and feuds that the government will invest in making things as clean as possible.

    I would rather pay less for my bills than what holiday makers think of there being an oil pump off the coast that they can’t even see.

    At least Spain is not invading other countries around the world and taking the crude by force and killing innocent people…USA… On a final note, granted some creatures will be effected…but its not a main fishing area that will result in food shortages for the country…and i could care less about fish that aren’t edible anyway. Greenpeace activists should just stick to smoking the green and stop wasting other peoples time and getting involved in matters that have an effect on people who actually pay taxes and have a job and don’t walk around with a pipe and loudspeaker shouting “lets save the planet”…there is no saving anything…everything has an expiry date…live with it, move on, and get a life!

    As for earthquakes…we get them many times on the coast of alicante …small tremors…i doubt that small level of oil drilling will have a large impact in this regard, if it did, they will be ordered to stop. Such a small amount is not great, but will definitely have a large positive effect on the country, its dependency, and its population.

  3. kiko cabarkapa
    July 22, 2014, 7:03 am

    Totally agree Kathleen. The fact that people just think about this possibility makes me sick…

  4. Kornelia
    Bergen, Norway
    July 21, 2014, 1:06 pm

    This is sooo saaaad…

  5. kathleen m
    New York
    June 27, 2014, 9:56 am

    Big Oil/Gas CEOs have gone insane with greed and are taking advantage of cash strapped/ greedy politicians to get their way.
    Here in NY we are battling to keep NG out, but it’s a steep uphill, very demoralizing battle.
    NOTHING is sacred…not the environment, the water, the wildlife nor the human inhabitants of the area that they have decided to drill.
    Every one of them INSISTS that THEIR methods are perfectly safe and environmentally sound–until something goes terribly wrong–at which point they deny any of it was their fault, pay a small fine, shrug off the catastrophe and move on to the next drilling site. Leaving environmental devastation in their wake and local residents to suffer and try to clean it up.
    We should have progressed away from fossil fuels decades ago…but it’s so very lucrative for the Oil/Gas CEOs, they’ve done everything in their power to block any positive changes.
    This poor Earth and it’s all creatures is at the mercy of these greedy short sighted monsters.
    The future looks bleak unless we can stop them and move on to non-fossil fuel alternatives.
    I’m not holding my breath.