Woody biomass is gaining increased attention as a potential source of renewable, carbon-neutral energy, but a new study is casting doubt on just how eco-friendly this fuel source really is.
In areas with dense forests, such as the western United States, producing energy from combustible forest materials has been touted as a way to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, improve forest health, and create green jobs.
In particular, Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber has pushed strongly for the development of this resource as a way of meeting his state’s renewable energy portfolio standard and revitalizing stagnant rural economies by incentivizing the growth of the biomass industry, pushing for classification of biomass as a carbon neutral energy source, and installing biomass burning furnaces in public schools. Federal and state subsidies aim to jumpstart energy production from biomass, and the EPA’s decision to wait three years before issuing rules concerning biomass emissions provides a stable window for growth in the short-term.
Despite the enthusiasm of biomass supporters, a study published last week in the journal Nature Climate Change shows that altering forest management practices in order to harvest and burn biomass in the western U.S. could increase carbon dioxide emissions from 2 to 14 percent over the next 20 years.
Forests act as a carbon sink, a reservoir that absorbs atmospheric carbon and sequesters it for long periods of time. The authors argue that burning biomass will release stored carbon faster than forests can reabsorb it. If this conclusion is accurate, it may have significant repercussions for the region’s small but expanding biomass industry and for policymakers seeking to curb carbon release.
Biomass advocates counter that, as forests regrow, they will regenerate the source of energy by recapturing all carbon originally sequestered in the burned biomass. While a recent University of Washington study supports this assertion by concluding biomass electricity production releases just 4 percent of the emissions created by burning coal, other studies have offered conflicting views. The discrepancies stem chiefly from disagreements about the timescale over which carbon emissions are considered and from differing projections of levels of biomass harvest.
The debate over the potential impact of biomass consumption on the carbon cycle highlights the difficulty of finding truly renewable, carbon neutral sources of energy and demonstrates the need for careful examination of research assessing new energy solutions. For now, Kitzhaber is standing by his support of biomass, citing its economic advantages. However, the new study will make it difficult for him to claim that biomass does not contribute to carbon emissions.
Although biomass may provide significant benefits for local economies, if the goal of energy policy is to curb carbon emissions, it may be best to promote other renewable energy sources. As regions work to find energy solutions that leverage locally available resources, environmental policymakers must answer vital questions about the often hazy effects of energy production on carbon release and storage. Unless additional research definitively quantifies the carbon costs or benefits of creating energy from biomass, policymakers will have to weigh the possibility that expanding this promising new resource could increase greenhouse gas emissions against the strong desire to reap its economic benefits.
Related Topics
Go Further
Animals
- Soy, skim … spider. Are any of these technically milk?Soy, skim … spider. Are any of these technically milk?
- This pristine piece of the Amazon shows nature’s resilienceThis pristine piece of the Amazon shows nature’s resilience
- Octopuses have a lot of secrets. Can you guess 8 of them?
- Animals
- Feature
Octopuses have a lot of secrets. Can you guess 8 of them?
Environment
- This pristine piece of the Amazon shows nature’s resilienceThis pristine piece of the Amazon shows nature’s resilience
- Listen to 30 years of climate change transformed into haunting musicListen to 30 years of climate change transformed into haunting music
- This ancient society tried to stop El Niño—with child sacrificeThis ancient society tried to stop El Niño—with child sacrifice
- U.S. plans to clean its drinking water. What does that mean?U.S. plans to clean its drinking water. What does that mean?
History & Culture
- Gambling is everywhere now. When is that a problem?Gambling is everywhere now. When is that a problem?
- Beauty is pain—at least it was in 17th-century SpainBeauty is pain—at least it was in 17th-century Spain
- The real spies who inspired ‘The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare’The real spies who inspired ‘The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare’
- Heard of Zoroastrianism? The religion still has fervent followersHeard of Zoroastrianism? The religion still has fervent followers
- Strange clues in a Maya temple reveal a fiery political dramaStrange clues in a Maya temple reveal a fiery political drama
Science
- NASA has a plan to clean up space junk—but is going green enough?NASA has a plan to clean up space junk—but is going green enough?
- Soy, skim … spider. Are any of these technically milk?Soy, skim … spider. Are any of these technically milk?
- Can aspirin help protect against colorectal cancers?Can aspirin help protect against colorectal cancers?
- The unexpected health benefits of Ozempic and MounjaroThe unexpected health benefits of Ozempic and Mounjaro
- Do you have an inner monologue? Here’s what it reveals about you.Do you have an inner monologue? Here’s what it reveals about you.
Travel
- Follow in the footsteps of Robin Hood in Sherwood ForestFollow in the footsteps of Robin Hood in Sherwood Forest
- This chef is taking Indian cuisine in a bold new directionThis chef is taking Indian cuisine in a bold new direction
- On the path of Latin America's greatest wildlife migrationOn the path of Latin America's greatest wildlife migration
- Everything you need to know about Everglades National ParkEverything you need to know about Everglades National Park